Quadro P5200 vs GeForce GTX 1660

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

133%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

132%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

131%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

130%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

128%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

118%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

118%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

118%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

107%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

107%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

100%

#29

Radeon PRO W7700

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

99%

#30

Radeon PRO W6600

MSRP: $649|Avg: $649

99%

#32

Radeon AI PRO R9700

MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450

94%

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

92%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

81%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

77%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

77%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

76%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1660 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro P5200	GeForce GTX 1660
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1660 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $240 for the Quadro P5200, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 33.2% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P5200	GeForce GTX 1660
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+33.2%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($240)	✅More affordable ($180)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P5200 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1660 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 and GeForce GTX 1660

Quadro P5200

The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 and the GeForce GTX 1660 reaches 11,639 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1660 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P5200	GeForce GTX 1660
G3D Mark Score	11,650	11,639
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2560+82%	1408
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.94 TFLOPS+78%	5.027 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1746 MHz	1785 MHz+2%
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	160+82%	88
L1 Cache	0.94 MB	1.4 MB+49%
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P5200	GeForce GTX 1660
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) — the Quadro P5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P5200	GeForce GTX 1660
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	6 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P5200	GeForce GTX 1660
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660).

Feature	Quadro P5200	GeForce GTX 1660
Encoder	NVENC 5.0	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP7	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1660's 120W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro P5200	GeForce GTX 1660
TDP	100W-17%	120W
Recommended PSU	500W	450W-10%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	0mm	229mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	116.5+20%	97.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P5200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $240, while the GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 and now averages $180. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 25% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.5 (Quadro P5200) vs 64.7 (GeForce GTX 1660) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 33.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).