Quadro P5200 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 171.1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P5200.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-171.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+171.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $240), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 10.3% better value per dollar than the Quadro P5200.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($240) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 171.1%. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,650 | 31,578+171% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 7680+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.94 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+348% |
| Boost Clock | 1746 MHz | 2610 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 7.5 MB+698% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 96.1% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-65% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 116.5+5% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $240, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The Quadro P5200 costs 59.3% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.5 (Quadro P5200) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 10.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-37% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $240-59% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.5 | 53.5+10% |
| Codename | GP104 | AD104 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #230 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P5200 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
