Quadro P5200 vs Arc A580
Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Arc A580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200
Performance Per Dollar Arc A580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P5200.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (271mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $179 versus $240 for the Quadro P5200, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 38.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($240) | ✅More affordable ($179) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 and Arc A580
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Arc A580
The Arc A580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 10 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,060 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 scores 11,650 and the Arc A580 reaches 12,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 is built on Pascal while the Arc A580 uses Generation 12.7, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200) vs 3,072 (Arc A580). Raw compute: 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Arc A580). Boost clocks: 1746 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,650 | 12,060+4% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.94 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1746 MHz | 2000 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A580 has 8 GB. The Arc A580 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200) vs 8 MB (Arc A580) — the Arc A580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A580). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A580). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (Arc A580).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 draws 100W versus the Arc A580's 175W — a 54.5% difference. The Quadro P5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200) vs 600W (Arc A580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 271mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-43% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 271mm |
| Height | 0mm | 132mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 116.5+69% | 68.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $240, while the Arc A580 launched at $179 and now averages $179. The Arc A580 costs 25.4% less ($61 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.5 (Quadro P5200) vs 67.4 (Arc A580) — the Arc A580 offers 39% better value. The Arc A580 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 | Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $179-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $240 | $179-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.5 | 67.4+39% |
| Codename | GP104 | DG2-512 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | October 10 2023 |
| Ranking | #230 | #223 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P5200 and Arc A580
