
Quadro P6000 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro P6000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P6000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 54.1% higher G3D Mark score and 290.6% more VRAM (23 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | Quadro P6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+54.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-54.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+290.6%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $1,500), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 1522% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1522%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P6000 and GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the Quadro P6000 leads by 54.1%. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,512+54% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+50% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+42% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 1733 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+49% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P6000 comes with 23 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 290.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 125% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 23.438 GB+291% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+125% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 180W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0+11% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P6000 launched at $5999 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 96% less ($1440 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Quadro P6000) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1528.2% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5999 | $249-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | $60-96% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 167.7+1528% |
| Codename | GP102 | GP104 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #141 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












