Quadro P6000 vs GeForce RTX 2060
Quadro P6000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P6000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2060 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.9% higher G3D Mark score and 290.6% more VRAM (23 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2060.
| Insight | Quadro P6000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+9.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+290.6%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $1,500 for the Quadro P6000, it costs 92% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1037.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P6000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1037.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P6000 and GeForce RTX 2060
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the Quadro P6000 leads by 9.9%. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,512+10% | 14,114 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+100% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+96% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 1680 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 240+100% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 1.9 MB+36% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P6000 comes with 23 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The Quadro P6000 offers 290.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 28.6% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 23.438 GB+291% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+29% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 72.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 160W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 72-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0 | 88.2+42% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P6000 launched at $5999 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 92% less ($1380 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Quadro P6000) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1041.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5999 | $349-94% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | $120-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 117.6+1042% |
| Codename | GP102 | TU106 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #141 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P6000 and GeForce RTX 2060
