
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs GeForce RTX 2060

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 112.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2060.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+112.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-112.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $300 for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel), it costs 60% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 17.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+17.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 2060

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 112.3%. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 320 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964+112% | 14,114 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+33% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS+24% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1680 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+33% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+32% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+33% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 320+33% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2.0.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 37% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-31% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+209% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 60% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 99.9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 17.7% better value.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900 | $349-61% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $120-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.9 | 117.6+18% |
| Codename | TU104 | TU106 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #201 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














