
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Very Large (Check Case) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $1,100 for the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 273.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+273.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 and the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti reaches 29,395 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1860 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 84 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) with 320 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964+2% | 29,395 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 10752+320% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 40 TFLOPS+401% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1860 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 160 | 336+110% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 10.5 MB+320% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 84+110% |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | 336+5% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is capped at DLSS 2.0.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 450W — a 121.4% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 336mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-76% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-24% | 850W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 336mm |
| Height | 0mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+317% | 65.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 and now averages $1100. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 72.7% less ($800 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 99.9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 26.7 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 274.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-55% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-73% | $1100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.9+274% | 26.7 |
| Codename | TU104 | GA102 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | January 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #201 | #19 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














