
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $800 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, it costs 63% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 151% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+151%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 6.2%. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 66 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) with 320 Tensor cores vs 264.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964 | 31,828+6% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 8448+230% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS+452% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2610 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 264+65% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 8.3 MB+232% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 66+65% |
| Tensor Cores | 320+21% | 264 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 88.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 0mm vs 310mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-61% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 0mm | 310mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+144% | 111.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 and now averages $800. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 62.5% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 99.9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 151% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900 | $799-11% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-63% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.9+151% | 39.8 |
| Codename | TU104 | AD103 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #201 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














