Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (32 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $4,086.44 for the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2, it costs 93% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1242.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1242.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,086.44) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.
GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,399 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 and the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 reaches 30,399 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 21,760 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 170 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) with 320 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 29,964 | 30,399+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 21760+750% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+1212% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2407 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 160 | 680+325% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 21.3 MB+752% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 170+325% |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | 680+113% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 has 32 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 96 MB (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) — the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2's 575W — a 135.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 1000W (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 16-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-81% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-35% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 16-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 272.4+415% | 52.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) launched at $900 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 launched at $1999 and now averages $4086.44. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) costs 92.7% less ($3786 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 99.9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 7.4 (GeForce RTX 5090 D v2) — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) offers 1250% better value. The GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 5090 D v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $900-55% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-93% | $4086.44 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.9+1250% | 7.4 |
| Codename | TU104 | GB202 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | August 15 2025 |
| Ranking | #201 | #15 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 5090 D v2
