Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) vs GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

#9

Intel Arc Pro B50

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

105%

#11

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $900|Avg: $300

100%

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

93%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

92%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

92%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

91%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

90%

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

83%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

82%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

82%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

75%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

#42

Radeon RX 6600S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

173%

#43

Radeon RX 8060S

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

170%

#47

Radeon RX 6700S

MSRP: $479|Avg: $300

167%

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

119%

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

115%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

105%

#56

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

82%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

80%

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

74%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm)	🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell (2024−2025) / 4nm)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)	🎮 High Capacity (24 GB)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1110 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,964 points.

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 990 MHz to 1515 MHz. It has 10496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,280 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) scores 29,964 versus the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile's 28,280 — the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) leads by 6%. The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 10,496 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1515 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	29,964+6%	28,280
Architecture	Turing	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2560	10496+310%
Boost Clock	1560 MHz+3%	1515 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.0 (Native)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	24 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
DirectX	12.1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC (Blackwell) (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (Blackwell). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	NVENC (Blackwell)
Decoder	4th Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (Blackwell)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile's 95W — a 14.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)	GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
TDP	110W	95W-14%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85
Perf/Watt	272.4	297.7+9%