Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design vs Arc A750
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design and Arc A750
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design scores 12,675 and the Arc A750 reaches 12,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 28 (Arc A750) with 384 Tensor cores vs 448.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,675 | 12,600 |
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.294 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+107% |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | 2400 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+71% | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 384 | 448+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A750 has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 95.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 268mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-64% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 268mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 78°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 158.4+183% | 56.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $289 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $229 |
| Codename | TU104 | DG2-512 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #208 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design and Arc A750
