
Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce RTX 2080

Quadro RTX 6000
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2080
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 6000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2080 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 6000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+203.6%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2080 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $1,800 for the Quadro RTX 6000, it costs 86% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 651.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 6000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+651.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,800) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 6000 and GeForce RTX 2080

Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.

GeForce RTX 2080
The GeForce RTX 2080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,676 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 6000 scores 17,887 and the GeForce RTX 2080 reaches 18,676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 6000 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2080 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 2080) with 576 Tensor cores vs 368.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,887 | 18,676+4% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+57% | 2944 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+62% | 10.07 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+4% | 1710 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+57% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+55% | 2.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+57% | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | 576+57% | 368 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 6000 comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2080 has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 203.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+204% | 7.906 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+71% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2080). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2080).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 6000 draws 260W versus the GeForce RTX 2080's 215W — a 18.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 2080). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 215W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 68.8 | 86.9+26% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300 MSRP and currently averages $1800, while the GeForce RTX 2080 launched at $699 and now averages $250. The GeForce RTX 2080 costs 86.1% less ($1550 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.9 (Quadro RTX 6000) vs 74.7 (GeForce RTX 2080) — the GeForce RTX 2080 offers 654.5% better value.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 6000 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6300 | $699-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1800 | $250-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 74.7+655% |
| Codename | TU102 | TU104 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | September 20 2018 |
| Ranking | #99 | #94 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












