Quadro RTX A6000 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX A6000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX A6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $330 versus $3,500 for the Quadro RTX A6000, it costs 91% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 983.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+983.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) | ✅More affordable ($330) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX A6000 and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 290W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,295 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti reaches 23,295 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 6,144 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 48 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) with 336 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,798 | 23,295+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+75% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.71 TFLOPS+78% | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz+2% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 336+75% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+75% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+75% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+75% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX A6000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 608 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) — a 26.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+500% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+26% | 608 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti's 290W — a 3.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 78°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 290W-3% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 78°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 80.3+6% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti launched at $599 and now averages $330. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti costs 90.6% less ($3170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 70.6 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti offers 986.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4649 | $599-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $330-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 70.6+986% |
| Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
| Release | October 5 2020 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #54 | #50 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX A6000 and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
