Quadro RTX A6000 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX A6000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX A6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (48 GB vs 16 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB.
| Insight | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $449 versus $3,500 for the Quadro RTX A6000, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 676.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+676.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($3,500) | ✅More affordable ($449) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX A6000 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reaches 22,713 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) with 336 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,798 | 22,713 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 10752+147% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 38.71 TFLOPS+75% | 22.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1800 MHz | 2535 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 112+133% | 48 |
| TMUs | 336+147% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 10.5 MB+144% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 32 MB+433% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 84+147% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 336+147% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX A6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX A6000 comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 166.7% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+200% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 768 GB/s+167% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 32 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 58.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 65°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 165W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin EPS | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-9% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 65°C-24% |
| Perf/Watt | 76.0 | 137.7+81% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649 MSRP and currently averages $3500, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499 and now averages $449. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB costs 87.2% less ($3051 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 50.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 678.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Quadro RTX A6000 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4649 | $499-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3500 | $449-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 50.6+678% |
| Codename | GA102 | AD106 |
| Release | October 5 2020 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #54 | #56 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX A6000 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
