G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX A6000

2020

Why buy it

✅27.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅75% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 192).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌172.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 110W.
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 110W instead of 300W, a 190W reduction.
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX A6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (22,798 vs 22,119), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro RTX A6000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro RTX A6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and strong 1440p, Quadro RTX A6000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro RTX A6000 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX A6000

The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX A6000 scores 22,798 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 22,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX A6000 is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1800 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 84 RT cores (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 336 Tensor cores vs 192.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score	22,798+3%	22,119
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	10752+75%	6144
Compute (TFLOPS)	38.71 TFLOPS+45%	26.73 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1800 MHz+8%	1665 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	336+75%	192
L1 Cache	10.5 MB+75%	6 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB	48 MB+700%
Ray Tracing Cores	84+75%	48
Tensor Cores	336+75%	192

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX A6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX A6000 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU carries 12 GB. Quadro RTX A6000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 77.8% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro RTX A6000 and 192-bit on the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity	48 GB+300%	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	768 GB/s+78%	432 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+100%	192-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB	48 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000) vs AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Encoder	NVENC (7th Gen)	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	AV1,H.265,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX A6000 draws 300W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 110W — a 92.7% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX A6000) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin EPS vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85.

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
TDP	300W	110W-63%
Recommended PSU	500W	150W-70%
Power Connector	8-pin EPS	Mobile
Length	267mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85	85
Perf/Watt	76.0	201.1+165%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU (2023 vs 2020).

Feature	Quadro RTX A6000	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
MSRP	$4649	—
Codename	GA102	AD104
Release	October 5 2020	August 9 2023
Ranking	#54	#47

Search Quadro RTX A6000 on Amazon

Search RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.