Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs GeForce RTX 4070
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is positioned at rank #105 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 286.8% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T2000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-286.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+286.8%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $550 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 5.5% better value per dollar than the Quadro T2000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T2000 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 4070
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro T2000 (móvel) scores 6,959 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 286.8%. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,959 | 26,919+287% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 5888+475% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+697% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2475 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 184+188% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 5.8 MB+480% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 36 MB+3500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 36 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) draws 60W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 3 slots.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-70% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 116.0 | 134.6+16% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) costs 72.7% less ($400 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 46.4 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 5.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-17% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-73% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.4 | 48.9+5% |
| Codename | TU117 | AD104 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #319 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro T2000 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 4070
