Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 570

CPU

GPU

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1575 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

Similar parts

···

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX 570

2017Core: 1168 MHzBoost: 1244 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 570 Performance Spectrum

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

4 GB 60

6,959

0.0%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

Radeon RX 570

4 GB 120

6,967

+0.1%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅3.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Radeon RX 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 60W instead of 120W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
195.9% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 41.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Radeon RX 570

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 196.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.2 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌100% higher power demand at 120W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 570 instead at 6,967 vs 6,959, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 570 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $331 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 196.2% (41.2 vs 13.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 570 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T2000 (móvel) has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Radeon RX 570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

Radeon RX 570

The Radeon RX 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1168 MHz to 1244 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,967 points. Launch price was $169.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) scores 6,959 and the Radeon RX 570 reaches 6,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 570). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 5.095 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 570). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1244 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 570
G3D Mark Score	6,959	6,967
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.656 TFLOPS	5.095 TFLOPS+39%
Boost Clock	1785 MHz+43%	1244 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 570 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 570
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 (móvel) and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 570. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 570
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 12 (Radeon RX 570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 570
DirectX	12.1	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	5+25%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs H.265,H.264 (Radeon RX 570).

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 570
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP9	UVD 6.3
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.265,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) draws 60W versus the Radeon RX 570's 120W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 450W (Radeon RX 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 570
TDP	60W-50%	120W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	0mm	241mm
Height	0mm	120mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	116.0+100%	58.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro T2000 (móvel) came in at $500, while the Radeon RX 570 launched at $169. On MSRP, Radeon RX 570 was 66.2% cheaper ($331 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 41.2 (Radeon RX 570) — the Radeon RX 570 offers 196.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T2000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon RX 570
MSRP	$500	$169-66%
Performance per Dollar	13.9	41.2+196%
Codename	TU117	Polaris 20
Release	May 27 2019	April 18 2017
Ranking	#319	#356

Search Quadro T2000 (móvel) on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 570 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.