
Quadro T2000 (móvel)

Tesla M60
Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Tesla M60 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Tesla M60 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Tesla M60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 496.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Tesla M60 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 300W, a 240W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌500% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 300W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Tesla M60 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) scores 6,959 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,959 | 7,002 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2+32% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+52% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 (móvel) and 256-bit on the Tesla M60. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Tesla M60) — the Tesla M60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) draws 60W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-80% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 116.0+398% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro T2000 (móvel) came in at $500, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. On MSRP, Quadro T2000 (móvel) was 83.3% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the Quadro T2000 (móvel) offers 504.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T2000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-83% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9+504% | 2.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #319 | #355 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














