Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1575 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
AMD

RadeonT 780M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • 38.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 300% higher power demand at 60W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 60W, a 45W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro T2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 38.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RadeonT 780M instead at 7,098 vs 6,959, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RadeonT 780M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 12nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T2000 (móvel) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 780M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

AMD

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) scores 6,959 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

FeatureQuadro T2000 (móvel)RadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score
6,959
7,098+2%
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1024+33%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.656 TFLOPS
8.909 TFLOPS+144%
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2900 MHz+62%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64+33%
48
L1 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro T2000 (móvel)RadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 (móvel) and 128-bit on the RadeonT 780M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) — the RadeonT 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro T2000 (móvel)RadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro T2000 (móvel)RadeonT 780M
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

FeatureQuadro T2000 (móvel)RadeonT 780M
Encoder
NVENC 7.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP9
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) draws 60W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 120% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro T2000 (móvel)RadeonT 780M
TDP
60W
15W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
116.0
473.2+308%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 780M (2024 vs 2019).

FeatureQuadro T2000 (móvel)RadeonT 780M
MSRP
$500
Codename
TU117
Phoenix
Release
May 27 2019
January 31 2024
Ranking
#319
#359

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.