
Quadro T2000 (móvel)

RadeonT 780M
Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅38.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 60W vs 15W.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 60W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) scores 6,959 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,959 | 7,098+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+33% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.656 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+144% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2900 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 (móvel) and 128-bit on the RadeonT 780M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 780M) — the RadeonT 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) draws 60W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 120% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W | 15W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 116.0 | 473.2+308% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RadeonT 780M (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro T2000 (móvel) | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | Phoenix |
| Release | May 27 2019 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #319 | #359 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














