
Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU vs GRID M6-0B

Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
Popular choices:

GRID M6-0B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-0B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M6-0B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M6-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | GRID M6-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M6-0B remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU and GRID M6-0B
Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.

GRID M6-0B
The GRID M6-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 912 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU scores 892 and the GRID M6-0B reaches 912 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | GRID M6-0B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 892 | 912+2% |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | GRID M6-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M6-0B has 512 MB. The GRID M6-0B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | GRID M6-0B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU draws 7W versus the GRID M6-0B's 100W — a 173.8% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 350W (GRID M6-0B). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | GRID M6-0B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-93% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 127.4+1300% | 9.1 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GRID M6-0B launched at $1500 and now averages $100. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU costs 100+% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU) vs 9.1 (GRID M6-0B) — the Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 680 GPU | GRID M6-0B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.1 |
| Codename | — | GM204 |
| Release | December 6 2018 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #915 | #535 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












