Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU vs Iris Graphics 6100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Graphics 6100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Graphics 6100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU.

Insight	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Iris Graphics 6100
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Graphics 6100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU Benchmark Check

Iris Graphics 6100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU and Iris Graphics 6100

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.

Iris Graphics 6100

The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU scores 889 and the Iris Graphics 6100 reaches 899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Iris Graphics 6100
G3D Mark Score	889	899+1%
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Iris Graphics 6100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Iris Graphics 6100
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Graphics 6100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Iris Graphics 6100
DirectX	12_0	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	3.2	4.6+44%
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,VC-1 (Iris Graphics 6100).

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Iris Graphics 6100
Encoder	—	QuickSync
Decoder	—	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU draws 7W versus the Iris Graphics 6100's 15W — a 72.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 6100). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Iris Graphics 6100
TDP	7W-53%	15W
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Length	1mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	127.0+112%	59.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Graphics 6100 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) — the Iris Graphics 6100 offers NaN% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).