Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU vs Radeon HD 4770

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4770

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

870%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

836%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

826%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

824%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

823%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

818%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

808%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

805%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

797%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

795%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

786%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

784%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

770%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

769%

#87

Radeon RX 7500

MSRP: $229|Avg: $229

98%

#88

Radeon Ryzen 5 5500H

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

97%

#89

Moore Threads MTT S70

MSRP: $345|Avg: $140

93%

#134

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

959%

#149

Radeon HD 4770

MSRP: $109|Avg: $109

100%

#150

Radeon HD 8510G

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

99%

#151

Radeon HD 8550G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#153

GeForce GT 635

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

98%

#154

Radeon R7 A8-7500

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

97%

#155

Radeon HD 5670

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

97%

#157

GeForce GT 740A

MSRP: $89|Avg: $20

96%

#158

Radeon HD 7420G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

95%

#159

Radeon HD 7500G

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

95%

#161

GeForce GT 430

MSRP: $79|Avg: $40

91%

#164

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

MSRP: $173|Avg: $35

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is significantly newer (2018 vs 2009). The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4770 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 4770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU.

Insight	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 4770 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 4770 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU and Radeon HD 4770

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.

Radeon HD 4770

The Radeon HD 4770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 28 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 909 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU scores 889 and the Radeon HD 4770 reaches 909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
G3D Mark Score	889	909+2%
Process Node	7 nm	40 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4770 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 4770 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4770). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
DirectX	12_0+19%	10.1
OpenGL	3.2	3.3+3%
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4770).

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
Decoder	—	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon HD 4770's 80W — a 167.8% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 400W (Radeon HD 4770). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 203mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon HD 4770
TDP	7W-91%	80W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	400W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	203mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	72°C
Perf/Watt	127.0+1014%	11.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon HD 4770 launched at $109 and now averages $109. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU costs 100+% less ($109 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 8.3 (Radeon HD 4770) — the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2009).