
Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU vs Radeon Vega 3

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Vega 3 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Vega 3 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU and Radeon Vega 3
Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.

Radeon Vega 3
The Radeon Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU scores 889 and the Radeon Vega 3 reaches 892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 889 | 892 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (Radeon Vega 3). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| OpenGL | 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon Vega 3).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | — | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon Vega 3's 45W — a 146.2% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-84% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 127.0+541% | 19.8 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon Vega 3 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3) — the Radeon Vega 3 offers NaN% better value. The Radeon Vega 3 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | — | Cezanne |
| Release | December 6 2018 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #916 | #601 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















