Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU vs Radeon Vega 3

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU vs Radeon Vega 3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU vs Radeon Vega 3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 45W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Vega 3

2021

Why buy it

✅Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Vega 3 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌542.9% higher power demand at 45W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Vega 3 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (892 vs 889), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Vega 3 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Vega 3 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU vs Radeon Vega 3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.

Radeon Vega 3

The Radeon Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 892 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU scores 889 and the Radeon Vega 3 reaches 892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon Vega 3
G3D Mark Score	889	892
Process Node	7 nm	7 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon Vega 3
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU and System on the Radeon Vega 3.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon Vega 3
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (Radeon Vega 3). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon Vega 3
DirectX	12_0	12 (FL 12_1)
OpenGL	3.2	4.6+44%
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon Vega 3).

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon Vega 3
Encoder	—	VCN 1.0
Decoder	—	VCN 1.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon Vega 3's 45W — a 146.2% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon Vega 3
TDP	7W-84%	45W
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	127.0+541%	19.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU came in at $0, while the Radeon Vega 3 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3) — the Radeon Vega 3 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 3 (2021 vs 2018).

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU	Radeon Vega 3
MSRP	$0	$0
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	Infinity
Codename	—	Cezanne
Release	December 6 2018	April 13 2021
Ranking	#916	#601

Search Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU on Amazon

Search Radeon Vega 3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.