
Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Vega (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2018. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 906 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU scores 889 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 889 | 906+2% |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 72.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-53% | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 127.0+110% | 60.4 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U offers NaN% better value.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | — | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | December 6 2018 | January 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #916 | #831 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















