
Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU vs GeForce RTX 3070

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2394% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2394%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2394%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3070 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU and GeForce RTX 3070
Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU scores 889 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 2394%.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 889 | 22,172+2394% |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | — | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU draws 7W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 187.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-97% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 127.0+26% | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU costs 100+% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 110.9 |
| Codename | — | GA104 |
| Release | December 6 2018 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #916 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















