Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
124.7% HIGHER MSRP
$200 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $111 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 120.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 250 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (1,072 vs 1,051), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 250 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $111 cheaper on MSRP at $89 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 120.3% (11.8 vs 5.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU vs Radeon R7 250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,072 points.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU scores 1,072 and the Radeon R7 250 reaches 1,051 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 250
G3D Mark Score	1,072+2%	1,051
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 250
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 carries 2 GB. Radeon R7 250 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 250
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 161.1% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 250
TDP	7W-89%	65W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	153.1+845%	16.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250 was 55.5% cheaper ($111 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU) vs 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) — the Radeon R7 250 offers 118.5% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU	Radeon R7 250
MSRP	$200	$89-56%
Performance per Dollar	5.4	11.8+119%
Codename	—	Oland
Release	December 6 2018	October 8 2013
Ranking	#860	#871

Search Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.