
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs FirePro W5000

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

FirePro W5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2024 vs 2012). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W5000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and FirePro W5000
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

FirePro W5000
The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS scores 3,000 and the FirePro W5000 reaches 2,967 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 768 (FirePro W5000).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,000+1% | 2,967 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W5000 has 2 GB. The FirePro W5000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 12 (FirePro W5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2.170. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2.170 |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W5000). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W5000).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Adreno VPU | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Adreno VPU | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS draws 20W versus the FirePro W5000's 75W — a 115.8% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 350W (FirePro W5000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 183mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-73% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 183mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 150.0+279% | 39.6 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro W5000 launched at $599 and now averages $40. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 74.2 (FirePro W5000) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2012).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 74.2 |
| Codename | — | Pitcairn |
| Release | September 3 2024 | August 7 2012 |
| Ranking | #636 | #585 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















