Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Qualcomm Adreno...

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS.

Insight	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Longevity	Legacy (4nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Benchmark Check

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,035 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS scores 3,000 and the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU reaches 3,035 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
G3D Mark Score	3,000	3,035+1%
Process Node	4 nm	7 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs ES 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	ES 3.2	ES 3.2
Max Displays	3	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs VPU (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs VPU. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU).

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
Encoder	Adreno VPU	VPU
Decoder	Adreno VPU	VPU
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9	AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS draws 20W versus the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU's 7W — a 96.3% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.

Feature	Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS	Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU
TDP	20W	7W-65%
Recommended PSU	1W	1W
Power Connector	Integrated	Integrated
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	150.0	433.6+189%

💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno X1-85 GPU offers NaN% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).