
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs Quadro K1200

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

Quadro K1200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K1200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS and Quadro K1200
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in September 3 2024. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,000 points.

Quadro K1200
The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS scores 3,000 and the Quadro K1200 reaches 2,965 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 512 (Quadro K1200).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,000+1% | 2,965 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1200 has 4 GB. The Quadro K1200 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS draws 20W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 76.9% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-56% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 150.0+128% | 65.9 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro K1200 launched at $300 and now averages $184. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS costs 100+% less ($184 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS) vs 16.1 (Quadro K1200) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Quadro K1200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $184 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 16.1 |
| Codename | — | GM107 |
| Release | September 3 2024 | January 28 2015 |
| Ranking | #636 | #586 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















