
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs FirePro W8100

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

FirePro W8100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is positioned at rank 197 and the FirePro W8100 is on rank 254, so the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W8100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W8100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W8100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $250 for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 21.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+21.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and FirePro W8100
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 and the FirePro W8100 reaches 6,812 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 2,560 (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000+3% | 6,812 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12 (FirePro W8100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Adreno VPU | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | Adreno VPU | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the FirePro W8100's 220W — a 138.5% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (FirePro W8100). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-82% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 87°C |
| Perf/Watt | 175.0+465% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 and now averages $200. The FirePro W8100 costs 20% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 34.1 (FirePro W8100) — the FirePro W8100 offers 21.8% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-90% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $200-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0 | 34.1+22% |
| Codename | — | Hawaii |
| Release | October 26 2023 | June 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #482 | #361 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















