
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is positioned at rank 197 and the GeForce GTX 980M is on rank 53, so the GeForce GTX 980M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 980M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 980M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 980M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 980M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $250 for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, it costs 68% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 228.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+228.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and GeForce GTX 980M
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 versus the GeForce GTX 980M's 7,353 — the GeForce GTX 980M leads by 5%. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1127 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000 | 7,353+5% |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+33% | 1127 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 980M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M) — a 18.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 135 GB/s | 160 GB/s+19% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.5+41% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Adreno VPU | NVENC 2.0 |
| Decoder | Adreno VPU | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the GeForce GTX 980M's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 980M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-60% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 175.0+138% | 73.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980M costs 68% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 91.9 (GeForce GTX 980M) — the GeForce GTX 980M offers 228.2% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $80-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0 | 91.9+228% |
| Codename | — | GM204 |
| Release | October 26 2023 | October 7 2014 |
| Ranking | #482 | #344 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















