Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is positioned at rank 197 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is on rank 50, so the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | Legacy (4nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $250 for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 231.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+231.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) reaches 6,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1485 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000 | 6,968 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz+1% | 1485 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) — a 5.5% advantage for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 135 GB/s+5% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Adreno VPU | NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing) |
| Decoder | Adreno VPU | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-20% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 87 |
| Perf/Watt | 175.0+26% | 139.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) costs 70% less ($175 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 92.9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) offers 231.8% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $75-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0 | 92.9+232% |
| Codename | — | TU116 |
| Release | October 26 2023 | April 23 2020 |
| Ranking | #482 | #324 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
