Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
VS
Quadro T2000

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Quadro T2000

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

2023Boost: 1500 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T2000

2010Core: 625 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is positioned at rank 197 and the Quadro T2000 is on rank 125, so the Quadro T2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

#187
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
388%
#189
352%
#190
351%
#194
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
319%
#195
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
317%
#197
100%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
96%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000

#64
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547
99%
#65
RTX A4000H
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927
97%
#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
90%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
85%
#110
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1218%
#125
Quadro T2000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $75
100%
#130
FirePro D300
MSRP: $500|Avg: $20
94%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
92%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
91%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
88%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
88%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
88%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
82%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro T2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro T2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS.

InsightQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQuadro T2000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4%)
Leading raw performance (+4%)
Longevity
Legacy (4nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro T2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $250 for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 246.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQuadro T2000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+246.6%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Quadro T2000

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000

The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 and the Quadro T2000 reaches 7,279 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 192 (Quadro T2000).

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQuadro T2000
G3D Mark Score
7,000
7,279+4%
Process Node
4 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1536+700%
192

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQuadro T2000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 has 4 GB. The Quadro T2000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQuadro T2000
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQuadro T2000
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
ES 3.2
4.6+44%
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQuadro T2000
Encoder
Adreno VPU
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
Adreno VPU
PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 43.1% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQuadro T2000
TDP
40W-35%
62W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
175.0+49%
117.4
💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the Quadro T2000 launched at $600 and now averages $75. The Quadro T2000 costs 70% less ($175 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 97.1 (Quadro T2000) — the Quadro T2000 offers 246.8% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).

FeatureQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQuadro T2000
MSRP
$250-58%
$600
Avg Price (30d)
$250
$75-70%
Performance per Dollar
28.0
97.1+247%
Codename
GF106
Release
October 26 2023
December 24 2010
Ranking
#482
#902