
Radeon 535 vs Radeon R7 M260X

Radeon 535
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 M260X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 535 is positioned at rank 119 and the Radeon R7 M260X is on rank 410, so the Radeon 535 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M260X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 535 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M260X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 535 | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M260X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M260X holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $100), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 175.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 535 | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+175.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 535 and Radeon R7 M260X

Radeon 535
The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R7 M260X
The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 535 scores 1,049 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 715 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,049+4% | 1,013 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS+121% | 0.5491 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz+65% | 715 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 535 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M260X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 535 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 535) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0+56% | 13.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 535 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139 and now averages $35. The Radeon R7 M260X costs 65% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.5 (Radeon 535) vs 28.9 (Radeon R7 M260X) — the Radeon R7 M260X offers 175.2% better value. The Radeon 535 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 535 | Radeon R7 M260X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-28% | $139 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $35-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5 | 28.9+175% |
| Codename | Lexa | Opal |
| Release | April 20 2017 | December 6 2015 |
| Ranking | #668 | #878 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















