Radeon 535
VS
Radeon R7 M260X

Radeon 535 vs Radeon R7 M260X

AMD

Radeon 535

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

2015Core: 620 MHzBoost: 715 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 535 is positioned at rank 119 and the Radeon R7 M260X is on rank 410, so the Radeon 535 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 535

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
692%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
664%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
657%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
655%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
654%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
650%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
642%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
640%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
634%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
632%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
625%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
623%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
612%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
612%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
94%
#104
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
763%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
99%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
98%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
95%
#127
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
94%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
93%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
92%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M260X

#400
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1489%
#402
1350%
#403
1347%
#407
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1224%
#408
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1216%
#410
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
100%
#411
99%
#412
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
98%
#413
Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#414
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
98%
#415
Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#416
Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP: $550|Avg: $120
97%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
95%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
95%
#419
95%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
94%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
94%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
94%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#424
Radeon R5 310
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
#425
Radeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 535 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M260X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon 535Radeon R7 M260X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M260X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M260X holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $100), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 175.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon 535Radeon R7 M260X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+175.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 535 and Radeon R7 M260X

AMD

Radeon 535

The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 535 scores 1,049 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 535) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 715 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 535Radeon R7 M260X
G3D Mark Score
1,049+4%
1,013
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.211 TFLOPS+121%
0.5491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1183 MHz+65%
715 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 535Radeon R7 M260X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 535 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M260X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon 535Radeon R7 M260X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 535 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 535 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 535) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon 535Radeon R7 M260X
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
21.0+56%
13.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 535 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139 and now averages $35. The Radeon R7 M260X costs 65% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.5 (Radeon 535) vs 28.9 (Radeon R7 M260X) — the Radeon R7 M260X offers 175.2% better value. The Radeon 535 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon 535Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP
$100-28%
$139
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$35-65%
Performance per Dollar
10.5
28.9+175%
Codename
Lexa
Opal
Release
April 20 2017
December 6 2015
Ranking
#668
#878