Radeon 535 vs Radeon R9 A375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 535 vs Radeon R9 A375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 535 vs Radeon R9 A375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 535

2017

Why buy it

✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 A375 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
104.1% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

✅17.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 99.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.9 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 A375 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 535 instead at 1,049 vs 1,024, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 535 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 A375 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 99.2% (20.9 vs 10.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 A375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 535 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 535 vs Radeon R9 A375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 535

The Radeon 535 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 535 scores 1,049 and the Radeon R9 A375 reaches 1,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score	1,049+2%	1,024
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	640+25%
Boost Clock	1183 MHz+28%	925 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 535 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 A375.

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 535 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon 535) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R9 A375
TDP	50W	30W-40%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	21.0	34.1+62%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 535 came in at $100, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R9 A375 was 51% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.5 (Radeon 535) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the Radeon R9 A375 offers 99% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 535 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon 535	Radeon R9 A375
MSRP	$100	$49-51%
Performance per Dollar	10.5	20.9+99%
Codename	Lexa	Venus
Release	April 20 2017	2015
Ranking	#668	#877

Search Radeon 535 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 A375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.