Radeon 6750M vs GRID P40-6Q
Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:
GRID P40-6Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 6750M is positioned at rank 182 and the GRID P40-6Q is on rank 396, so the Radeon 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-6Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 6750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-6Q.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 6750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon 6750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $150), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 504% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+504%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 6750M and GRID P40-6Q
Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.
GRID P40-6Q
The GRID P40-6Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 6750M scores 911 and the GRID P40-6Q reaches 905 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID P40-6Q uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon 6750M) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-6Q). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-6Q).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 911 | 905 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1536+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 2.289 TFLOPS+297% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 128 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon 6750M) vs 512 KB (GRID P40-6Q) — the GRID P40-6Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 6750M draws 35W versus the GRID P40-6Q's 225W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6750M) vs 350W (GRID P40-6Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-84% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0+550% | 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 6750M costs 83.3% less ($125 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) vs 6.0 (GRID P40-6Q) — the Radeon 6750M offers 506.7% better value. The GRID P40-6Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | GRID P40-6Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-83% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4+507% | 6.0 |
| Codename | Whistler | GK104 |
| Release | January 4 2011 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #905 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 6750M and GRID P40-6Q
