Radeon 6750M vs Intel HD Graphics 620
Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:
Intel HD Graphics 620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 6750M is positioned at rank #182 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel HD Graphics 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 6750M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel HD Graphics 620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 6750M and Intel HD Graphics 620
Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.
Intel HD Graphics 620
The Intel HD Graphics 620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 30 2016. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 919 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 6750M scores 911 and the Intel HD Graphics 620 reaches 919 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Intel HD Graphics 620 uses Generation 9.5, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm++. Shader units: 480 (Radeon 6750M) vs 192 (Intel HD Graphics 620). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M) vs 0.384 TFLOPS (Intel HD Graphics 620).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 911 | 919 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm++ |
| Shading Units | 480+150% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS+50% | 0.384 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 6750M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel HD Graphics 620 has 0 MB. The Radeon 6750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 6750M draws 35W versus the Intel HD Graphics 620's 15W — a 80% difference. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6750M) vs 1W (Intel HD Graphics 620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 15W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 61.3+136% |
Value Analysis
The Intel HD Graphics 620 costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) vs Infinity (Intel HD Graphics 620) — the Intel HD Graphics 620 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel HD Graphics 620 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Whistler | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Release | January 4 2011 | August 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #905 | #906 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 6750M and Intel HD Graphics 620
