Radeon 6750M vs Iris Graphics 6100
Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:
Iris Graphics 6100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 6750M is positioned at rank #182 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 6750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Graphics 6100.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 6750M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 6750M and Iris Graphics 6100
Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.
Iris Graphics 6100
The Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 899 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 6750M scores 911 and the Iris Graphics 6100 reaches 899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Iris Graphics 6100 uses Generation 8.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon 6750M) vs 384 (Iris Graphics 6100). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Graphics 6100).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 911+1% | 899 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 8+33% | 6 |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 6750M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Graphics 6100 has 0 MB. The Radeon 6750M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 6750M draws 35W versus the Iris Graphics 6100's 15W — a 80% difference. The Iris Graphics 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6750M) vs 1W (Iris Graphics 6100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 15W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 59.9+130% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Graphics 6100 costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) vs Infinity (Iris Graphics 6100) — the Iris Graphics 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The Iris Graphics 6100 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Whistler | Broadwell GT3 |
| Release | January 4 2011 | January 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #905 | #913 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 6750M and Iris Graphics 6100
