Radeon 6750M vs Radeon R7 M440
Radeon 6750M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M440
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 6750M is positioned at rank 182 and the Radeon R7 M440 is on rank 586, so the Radeon 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6750M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M440
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 6750M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M440.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 6750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon 6750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $300), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1113.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1113.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 6750M and Radeon R7 M440
Radeon 6750M
The Radeon 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 911 points.
Radeon R7 M440
The Radeon R7 M440 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 891 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 901 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 6750M scores 911 and the Radeon R7 M440 reaches 901 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6750M is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 M440 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon 6750M) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M440). Raw compute: 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon 6750M) vs 0.5702 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M440).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 911+1% | 901 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+50% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.576 TFLOPS+1% | 0.5702 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+20% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 48 KB | 80 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon 6750M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R7 M440) — the Radeon 6750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 6750M draws 35W versus the Radeon R7 M440's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6750M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M440). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-53% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0+117% | 12.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 6750M costs 91.7% less ($275 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.4 (Radeon 6750M) vs 3.0 (Radeon R7 M440) — the Radeon 6750M offers 1113.3% better value. The Radeon R7 M440 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 6750M | Radeon R7 M440 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-92% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.4+1113% | 3.0 |
| Codename | Whistler | Meso |
| Release | January 4 2011 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #905 | #912 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 6750M and Radeon R7 M440
