RADEON 7500 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON 7500 is positioned at rank #384 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 7500

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

362700%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

348450%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

344400%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343800%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343100%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

341150%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

336850%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

335600%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

332500%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

331600%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

327600%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

326900%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

321000%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

320800%

#364

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

400000%

#379

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

100%

#380

GeForce4 Ti 4800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#381

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

100%

#382

GeForce4 Ti 4600

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#383

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

100%

#384

RADEON 7500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

100%

#385

GeForce3 Ti 500

MSRP: $349|Avg: $49

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON 7500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 262200% higher G3D Mark score and 6249.2% more VRAM (4 GB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 7500.

Insight	RADEON 7500	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-262200%)	✅Leading raw performance (+262200%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+6249.2%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 174766.7% better value per dollar than the RADEON 7500.

Insight	RADEON 7500	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+174766.7%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($50)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON 7500 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 7500 and GeForce GTX 1650

RADEON 7500

The RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7500 scores 3 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 262200%. The RADEON 7500 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON 7500) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 7500) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 7500	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	3	7,869+262200%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	512	896+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+146%
Boost Clock	1183 MHz	1665 MHz+41%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	128 KB	896 KB+600%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 7500	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 7500 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 6249.2% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (RADEON 7500) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 7500	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	4 GB+6249%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (RADEON 7500) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	RADEON 7500	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	8.1	12+48%
OpenGL	1.3	4.6+254%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Legacy (RADEON 7500) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Legacy vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (RADEON 7500) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	RADEON 7500	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	Legacy	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	Legacy	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 40% difference. The RADEON 7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7500) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

Feature	RADEON 7500	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	0.1	104.9+104800%

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 7500 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The RADEON 7500 costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (RADEON 7500) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 104800% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).