RADEON 7500 vs MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON 7500 is positioned at rank #384 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 7500

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

362700%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

348450%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

344400%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343800%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343100%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

341150%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

336850%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

335600%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

332500%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

331600%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

327600%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

326900%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

321000%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

320800%

#364

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

400000%

#379

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

100%

#380

GeForce4 Ti 4800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#381

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

100%

#382

GeForce4 Ti 4600

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#383

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

100%

#384

RADEON 7500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

100%

#385

GeForce3 Ti 500

MSRP: $349|Avg: $49

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON 7500 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The RADEON 7500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 693.7% more VRAM (512 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 7500.

Insight	RADEON 7500	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $50), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 36.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON 7500	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+36.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON 7500 Benchmark Check

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 7500 and MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

RADEON 7500

The RADEON 7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points. Launch price was $79.

MOBILITY/RADEON 9000

The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7500 scores 3 versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 4 — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 7500 is built on GCN 4.0 while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON 7500) vs 800 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 7500) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

Feature	RADEON 7500	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512	800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS+8%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	128 KB+60%	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 7500	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 7500 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 has 512 MB. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	RADEON 7500	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 8.1 (RADEON 7500) vs 8.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	RADEON 7500	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
DirectX	8.1	8.1
OpenGL	1.3	1.4+8%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Legacy (RADEON 7500) vs N/A (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Decoder: Legacy vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (RADEON 7500) vs MPEG-2 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000).

Feature	RADEON 7500	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
Encoder	Legacy	N/A
Decoder	Legacy	MPEG-2
Codecs	MPEG-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 7500 draws 50W versus the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000's 10W — a 133.3% difference. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7500) vs 0W (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

Feature	RADEON 7500	MOBILITY/RADEON 9000
TDP	50W	10W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	0W-100%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.4+300%

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 7500 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (RADEON 7500) vs 0.1 (MOBILITY/RADEON 9000) — the MOBILITY/RADEON 9000 offers 0% better value. The RADEON 7500 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).