
Radeon 860M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 760
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 860M is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 860M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 860M is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The Radeon 860M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 860M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 860M | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 860M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 860M and GeForce GTX 760

Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

GeForce GTX 760
The GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,813 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 860M scores 4,838 and the GeForce GTX 760 reaches 4,813 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce GTX 760 uses Kepler, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 760). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 2.378 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760). Boost clocks: 3000 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,838 | 4,813 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1152+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS+29% | 2.378 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz+190% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 96 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 860M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon 860M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760) — the Radeon 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 760's 170W — a 167.6% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 322.5+1040% | 28.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $30 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | GK104 |
| Release | Marchar 2025 | June 25 2013 |
| Ranking | #449 | #450 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















