
Radeon 860M vs Radeon RX 7600

Radeon 860M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 860M is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 860M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 242.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 860M.
| Insight | Radeon 860M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-242.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+242.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 860M and Radeon RX 7600

Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 860M scores 4,838 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 242.7%. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 3000 MHz vs 2655 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Radeon 860M) vs 32 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,838 | 16,581+243% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+608% |
| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz+13% | 2655 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 512 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 32+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 860M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 860M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon 860M) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 166.7% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-91% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 322.5+221% | 100.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $269 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $250 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Navi 33 |
| Release | Marchar 2025 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #449 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















