
Radeon 860M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon 860M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 860M is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 860M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 319.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 860M.
| Insight | Radeon 860M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-319.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+319.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 860M and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 860M scores 4,838 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 319.8%. The Radeon 860M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 860M) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 3000 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Radeon 860M) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 152.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,838 | 20,312+320% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 4864+850% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.072 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+427% |
| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz+80% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 80+900% |
| TMUs | 32 | 152+375% |
| L1 Cache | 0.06 MB | 4.8 MB+7900% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | 38+375% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 860M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon 860M) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 860M draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 172.1% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 860M) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-93% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 322.5+217% | 101.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon 860M | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $280 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | GA104 |
| Release | Marchar 2025 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #449 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















