RADEON 9200 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9200 is positioned at rank 748 and the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is on rank 745, so the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200

#737

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

271425%

#739

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

246050%

#740

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

245400%

#744

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

223150%

#745

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

221625%

#747

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

100%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

100%

#749

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

75%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

75%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

75%

#752

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

75%

#753

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

50%

#754

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

25%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

25%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9200

#735

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

180950%

#737

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

164033%

#738

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

163600%

#742

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

148767%

#743

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

147750%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

100%

#746

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

100%

#747

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

83%

#748

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

67%

#749

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

67%

#750

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

50%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

50%

#752

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

50%

#753

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

50%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

33%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

17%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

17%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON 9200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The RADEON 9200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON 9200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score and 296.8% more VRAM (256 MB vs 65 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9200.

Insight	RADEON 9200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Longevity	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+296.8%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $25 for the RADEON 9200, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 25% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON 9200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+25%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON 9200 Benchmark Check

MOBILITY RADEON 9200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9200 and MOBILITY RADEON 9200

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 scores 4 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 3 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 9200) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9200).

Feature	RADEON 9200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	GCN 3.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+42%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	96 KB+20%	80 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9200 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has 65 MB. The RADEON 9200 offers 296.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (RADEON 9200) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+297%	0.063 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9200's 50W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON 9200	MOBILITY RADEON 9200
TDP	50W	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9200 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The MOBILITY RADEON 9200 costs 40% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON 9200) vs 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9200) — the MOBILITY RADEON 9200 offers 0% better value. The RADEON 9200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).