RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 345M
RADEON 9200
Popular choices:
RADEON IGP 345M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9200 is positioned at rank 748 and the RADEON IGP 345M is on rank 414, so the RADEON IGP 345M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200
Performance Per Dollar RADEON IGP 345M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9200 uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON 9200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON IGP 345M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON IGP 345M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9200 and RADEON IGP 345M
RADEON 9200
The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
RADEON IGP 345M
The RADEON IGP 345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 scores 4 versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 3 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON IGP 345M uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 9200) vs 768 (RADEON IGP 345M). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 345M).
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 1.313 TFLOPS+67% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 192 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB+669% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9200 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 345M has 512 MB. The RADEON IGP 345M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) vs 1 MB (RADEON IGP 345M) — the RADEON IGP 345M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB+669% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The RADEON IGP 345M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 345M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 35W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | RADEON IGP 345M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Baffin |
| Release | May 13 2019 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #898 | #577 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9200 and RADEON IGP 345M
