RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 345M

AMD

RADEON 9200

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

RADEON IGP 345M

2016Core: 855 MHz
Similar parts
······

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 345M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 345M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 345M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

  • +33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • RADEON IGP 345M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON 9200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 42.9% higher power demand at 50W vs 35W.

RADEON IGP 345M

2016

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 35W instead of 50W, a 15W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON 9200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON 9200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

RADEON 9200 vs RADEON IGP 345M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

AMD

RADEON IGP 345M

The RADEON IGP 345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 scores 4 versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 3 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON IGP 345M uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 9200) vs 768 (RADEON IGP 345M). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200) vs 1.313 TFLOPS (RADEON IGP 345M).

FeatureRADEON 9200RADEON IGP 345M
G3D Mark Score
4+33%
3
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7864 TFLOPS
1.313 TFLOPS+67%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
48+100%
L1 Cache
96 KB
192 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
1 MB+669%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9200RADEON IGP 345M
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON IGP 345M carries 512 MB. RADEON IGP 345M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 and 64-bit on the RADEON IGP 345M. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) vs 1 MB (RADEON IGP 345M) — the RADEON IGP 345M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON 9200RADEON IGP 345M
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.13 MB
1 MB+669%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the RADEON IGP 345M's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The RADEON IGP 345M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200) vs 350W (RADEON IGP 345M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureRADEON 9200RADEON IGP 345M
TDP
50W
35W-30%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Perf/Watt
0.1
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9200 (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureRADEON 9200RADEON IGP 345M
MSRP
$99
Codename
Polaris 24
Baffin
Release
May 13 2019
October 30 2016
Ranking
#898
#577

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.