RADEON 9200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9200 is positioned at rank 748 and the GeForce4 Ti 4800 is on rank 384, so the GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200

#737

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

271425%

#739

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

246050%

#740

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

245400%

#744

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

223150%

#745

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

221625%

#747

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

100%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

100%

#749

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

75%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

75%

#751

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

75%

#752

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

75%

#753

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

50%

#754

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

25%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

25%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 Ti 4800

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

362700%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

348450%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

344400%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343800%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

343100%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

341150%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

336850%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

335600%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

332500%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

331600%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

327600%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

326900%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

321000%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

320800%

#368

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

400000%

#383

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

100%

#384

GeForce4 Ti 4800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#385

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

100%

#386

GeForce4 Ti 4600

MSRP: $399|Avg: $40

100%

#387

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

100%

#388

RADEON 7500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $50

100%

#389

GeForce3 Ti 500

MSRP: $349|Avg: $49

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON 9200 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The RADEON 9200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 50% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9200.

Insight	RADEON 9200	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-50%)	✅Leading raw performance (+50%)
Longevity	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON 9200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $40 for the GeForce4 Ti 4800, it costs 38% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 6.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON 9200	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+6.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($25)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON 9200 Benchmark Check

GeForce4 Ti 4800 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9200 and GeForce4 Ti 4800

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

GeForce4 Ti 4800

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 scores 4 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 leads by 50%. The RADEON 9200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 9200) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).

Feature	RADEON 9200	GeForce4 Ti 4800
G3D Mark Score	4	6+50%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	1.345 TFLOPS+71%
ROPs	8	48+500%
TMUs	24	60+150%
L1 Cache	96 KB	960 KB+900%
L2 Cache	128 KB	768 KB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9200	GeForce4 Ti 4800
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9200 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 has 512 MB. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (RADEON 9200) vs 768 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9200	GeForce4 Ti 4800
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	768 KB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON 9200	GeForce4 Ti 4800
TDP	50W-80%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	216mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9200 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399 and now averages $40. The RADEON 9200 costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.2 (RADEON 9200) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the RADEON 9200 offers 100% better value. The RADEON 9200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).