RADEON 9200 vs Radeon IGP 340M
RADEON 9200
Popular choices:
Radeon IGP 340M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9200 is positioned at rank 748 and the Radeon IGP 340M is on rank 414, so the Radeon IGP 340M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon IGP 340M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon IGP 340M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON 9200 | Radeon IGP 340M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9200 and Radeon IGP 340M
RADEON 9200
The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.
Radeon IGP 340M
The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 scores 4 versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 3 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon IGP 340M uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 9200) vs 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | Radeon IGP 340M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4+33% | 3 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3584+833% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+1267% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1500 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 224+833% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 896 KB+833% |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 4 MB+2977% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | Radeon IGP 340M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9200 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 340M has 512 MB. The Radeon IGP 340M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) vs 4 MB (Radeon IGP 340M) — the Radeon IGP 340M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | Radeon IGP 340M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.13 MB | 4 MB+2977% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 230W — a 128.6% difference. The RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 340M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | Radeon IGP 340M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | RADEON 9200 | Radeon IGP 340M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Vega 10 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #898 | #593 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9200 and Radeon IGP 340M
