RADEON 9200 vs Radeon IGP 340M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

RADEON 9200 vs Radeon IGP 340M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

RADEON 9200 vs Radeon IGP 340M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

RADEON 9200

2019

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Radeon IGP 340M is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so RADEON 9200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 230W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon IGP 340M

2018

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3 vs 4).
❌2018 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌360% higher power demand at 230W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (4 vs 3), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

RADEON 9200 vs Radeon IGP 340M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9200

The RADEON 9200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

Radeon IGP 340M

The Radeon IGP 340M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 852 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9200 scores 4 versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 3 — the RADEON 9200 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 9200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon IGP 340M uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 9200) vs 3,584 (Radeon IGP 340M). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon IGP 340M). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 9200	Radeon IGP 340M
G3D Mark Score	4+33%	3
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 5.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	3584+833%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS+1267%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz	1500 MHz+46%
ROPs	8	64+700%
TMUs	24	224+833%
L1 Cache	96 KB	896 KB+833%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	4 MB+2977%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 9200	Radeon IGP 340M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9200 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon IGP 340M carries 512 MB. Radeon IGP 340M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 and 64-bit on the Radeon IGP 340M. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 9200) vs 4 MB (Radeon IGP 340M) — the Radeon IGP 340M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 9200	Radeon IGP 340M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	4 MB+2977%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9200 draws 50W versus the Radeon IGP 340M's 230W — a 128.6% difference. The RADEON 9200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9200) vs 350W (Radeon IGP 340M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON 9200	Radeon IGP 340M
TDP	50W-78%	230W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9200 (2019 vs 2018).

Feature	RADEON 9200	Radeon IGP 340M
MSRP	$99	—
Codename	Polaris 24	Vega 10
Release	May 13 2019	August 26 2018
Ranking	#898	#593

Search RADEON 9200 on Amazon

Search Radeon IGP 340M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.