Radeon 9550 / X1050
VS
Radeon X1270

Radeon 9550 / X1050 vs Radeon X1270

AMD

Radeon 9550 / X1050

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon X1270

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 9550 / X1050.

InsightRadeon 9550 / X1050Radeon X1270
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-6.9%)
Leading raw performance (+6.9%)
Longevity
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon X1270 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 6.9% better value per dollar than the Radeon 9550 / X1050.

InsightRadeon 9550 / X1050Radeon X1270
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+6.9%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 9550 / X1050 and Radeon X1270

AMD

Radeon 9550 / X1050

The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29 points.

AMD

Radeon X1270

The Radeon X1270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 9550 / X1050 scores 29 versus the Radeon X1270's 31 — the Radeon X1270 leads by 6.9%. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1270 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 9550 / X1050) vs 384 (Radeon X1270). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 9550 / X1050) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1270). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 9550 / X1050Radeon X1270
G3D Mark Score
29
31+7%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.247 TFLOPS+59%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1218 MHz+19%
1024 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 9550 / X1050Radeon X1270
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 9550 / X1050) vs 128 KB (Radeon X1270) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 9550 / X1050Radeon X1270
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0 (Radeon 9550 / X1050) vs 9_0b (Radeon X1270). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon 9550 / X1050Radeon X1270
DirectX
9_0
9_0b
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 9550 / X1050 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1270's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon X1270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 9550 / X1050) vs 350W (Radeon X1270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 165mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon 9550 / X1050Radeon X1270
TDP
50W
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Perf/Watt
0.6
0.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 9550 / X1050 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon X1270 launched at $0 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.6 (Radeon 9550 / X1050) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1270) — the Radeon X1270 offers 0% better value.

FeatureRadeon 9550 / X1050Radeon X1270
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$49
$49
Performance per Dollar
0.6
0.6
Codename
Lexa
Polaris 24
Release
March 27 2019
May 13 2019
Ranking
#772
#898