
RADEON E4690
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8650D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON E4690 is positioned at rank 713 and the Radeon HD 8650D is on rank 295, so the Radeon HD 8650D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E4690
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON E4690 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8650D.
| Insight | RADEON E4690 | Radeon HD 8650D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8650D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8650D holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $558), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 263.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON E4690 | Radeon HD 8650D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+263.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($558) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON E4690 and Radeon HD 8650D

RADEON E4690
The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.

Radeon HD 8650D
The Radeon HD 8650D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 396 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON E4690 scores 405 and the Radeon HD 8650D reaches 396 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON E4690 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 8650D uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON E4690) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650D). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON E4690) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8650D). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon HD 8650D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 405+2% | 396 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+133% | 1.761 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon HD 8650D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon HD 8650D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON E4690 draws 95W versus the Radeon HD 8650D's 130W — a 31.1% difference. The RADEON E4690 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON E4690) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650D). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon HD 8650D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W-27% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 4.3+43% | 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON E4690 launched at $558 MSRP and currently averages $558, while the Radeon HD 8650D launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Radeon HD 8650D costs 73.1% less ($408 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.7 (RADEON E4690) vs 2.6 (Radeon HD 8650D) — the Radeon HD 8650D offers 271.4% better value. The RADEON E4690 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | RADEON E4690 | Radeon HD 8650D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $558 | $150-73% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $558 | $150-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.7 | 2.6+271% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Pitcairn |
| Release | September 29 2015 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #420 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













